Control hospitalario de la diabetes y de la hiperglucemia: una auditoría en hospitales españoles / Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals

Objetivos Evaluación de la calidad de la asistencia a los pacientes con diabetes mellitus ingresados en España. Métodos Estudio transversal que incluyó a 1.193 (26,7%) pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 o hiperglucemia de un total de 4.468 pacientes ingresados en los servicios de medicina interna de 53 hospitales (España). Se recogieron datos demográficos, adecuación de la monitorización de la glucemia capilar, tratamiento administrado durante el ingreso y terapia recomendada al alta. Resultados La edad mediana fue de 80 años (74-87), 561 (47%) pacientes eran mujeres, con un índice de Charlson de 4 (2-6) puntos, siendo clasificados frágiles 742 (65%). La mediana de glucemia al ingreso fue de 155 (119-213) mg/dL. Al tercer día de ingreso el número de glucemias capilares en objetivo (80-180mg/dL) fue de 792/1.126 (70,3%) en el predesayuno, 601/1.083 (55,4%) en la precomida, 591/1.073 (55,0%) en la precena y 317/529 (59,9%) durante la noche. Se observó hipoglucemia en 35 (0,9%) pacientes. El tratamiento durante el ingreso fue realizado con insulina en escala móvil en 352 (40,5%) pacientes, insulina basal y análogos de insulina rápida en 434 (50%) y dieta exclusivamente en 101 (9,1%). Un total de 735 (61,6%) pacientes disponían de un valor reciente de HbA1c. En el alta se incrementó el uso de iSGLT2 (30,1 vs. 21,6%; p<0,001) y el uso de insulina basal (25,3 vs. 10,1%; p<0,001). Conclusiones Existe un excesivo uso de insulina en escala móvil, una deficiente información de los valores de HbA1c y una prescripción aún deficiente de tratamientos con beneficio cardiovascular al alta (AU)

Objectives Evaluation of the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. Methods Cross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycemia out of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. Results The median age of the patients was 80 years (74-87), of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points (2-6), and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155mg/dL (119-213). On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80-180mg/dL) was pre-breakfast 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%) and night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogs in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At the time of discharge, the use of iSGLT2 increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p<0.001), as well as the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p<0.001). Conclusions There is an excessive use of insulin on a sliding scale as well as deficient information on HbA1c values and an even deficient prescription at the discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit (AU)

Inpatient management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia: an audit of Spanish hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to hospitals in Spain. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in one day that included 1193 (26.7%) patients with type 2 diabetes or hyperglycaemia out of a total of 4468 patients admitted to the internal medicine departments of 53 hospitals in Spain. We collected demographic data, adequacy of capillary glycaemic monitoring, treatment administered during admission, and recommended therapy at discharge. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 80 years [74-87], of which 561 (47%) were women, with a Charlson index of 4 points [2-6], and 742 (65%) were fragile. Median blood glucose on admission was 155 mg/dl [119-213]. On the third day, the number of capillary blood glucose levels in target (80-180 mg/dl) at pre-breakfast was 792/1126 (70.3%), pre-lunch 601/1083 (55.4%), pre-dinner 591/1073 (55.0%), and at night 317/529 (59.9%). A total of 35 patients (0.9%) were suffering from hypoglycemia. Treatment during hospitalization was performed with sliding scale insulin in 352 (40.5%) patients, with basal insulin and rapid insulin analogues in 434 (50%), or with diet exclusively in 101 (9.1%). A total of 735 (61.6%) patients had a recent HbA1c value. At discharge, the use of SGLT2i increased significantly (30.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.001), as did the use of basal insulin (25.3% vs. 10.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an excessive use of sliding scale insulin as well as insufficient information on HbA1c values and prescription upon discharge of treatments with cardiovascular benefit.

Efecto de semaglutida sobre los biomarcadores de la enfermedad del hígado graso en pacientes con diabetes y obesidad / Effect of semaglutide on fatty liver disease biomarkers in patients with diabetes and obesity

Objetivo El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar el efecto de la semaglutida subcutánea sobre los biomarcadores de la enfermedad metabólica hepática (MAFLD), a saber, el índice de esteatosis hepática (HSI) y el índice de fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), a las 24semanas en pacientes ambulatorios atendidos en los servicios de Medicina Interna. Métodos En este estudio se analizaron pacientes de un registro de cohortes en curso, multicéntrico, prospectivo, pre-post y no controlado que inscribe a pacientes únicos y consecutivos con diabetes tipo2 tratados con semaglutida subcutánea. La esteatosis/fibrosis se determinó mediante HSI (<30 descartada, >36 esteatosis) y FIB-4 (<1,3 descartada, >2,67 fibrosis), respectivamente. Resultados La muestra incluyó 213 pacientes (46,9% mujeres) con una mediana de edad de 64 (±19) años. El índice de masa corporal y el peso basales medios fueron de 36,1 (±8,4) kg/m2 y 98 (±26,9) kg, respectivamente. El 99,9% presentaba valores de HSI indicativos de esteatosis, con un HSI medio de 47,9 (±8,2). Además, el 10,8% presentaba fibrosis (FIB-4 >2,67) y el 42,72% tenía valores en rangos intermedios (FIB-4 1,3-2,67). A las 24 semanas se produjo una reducción significativa del HSI (−2,36 [IC95%: 1,83-2,9], p<0,00001) y del FIB-4 (−0,075 [IC95%: 0,015-0,14], p<0,016), relacionada principalmente con descensos del peso corporal, de los niveles de triglicéridos, de la resistencia a la insulina (estimada mediante el índice triglicéridos-glucosa) y de las enzimas hepáticas. Conclusiones Estos resultados muestran que la semaglutida subcutánea tuvo un efecto beneficioso sobre la esteatosis hepática que fue más allá del control de la glucosa. Sus efectos estaban relacionados principalmente con la pérdida de peso, la disminución de los biomarcadores y la mejora de la sensibilidad a la insulina. Para muchos pacientes, la detección precoz es esencial para mejorar los resultados de la MAFLD y puede permitir seleccionar las opciones terapéuticas más eficaces (AU)

Aim This work aims to assess the effect of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide on biomarkers of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), namely the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, at 24weeks in outpatients attended to in internal medicine departments. Methods This study analyzed patients in an ongoing, multicenter, prospective, pre-post, uncontrolled cohort registry that enrolls unique, consecutive patients with type2 diabetes treated with weekly subcutaneous semaglutide. Steatosis/fibrosis were determined by HSI (<30 ruled out, >36 steatosis) and FIB-4 (<1.3 ruled out, >2.67 fibrosis), respectively. Results The sample included 213 patients (46.9% women) with a median age of 64 (±19) years. The median baseline body mass index and weight were 36.1 (±8.4) kg/m2 and 98 (±26.9) kg, respectively. A total of 99.9% had HSI values indicating steatosis, with a mean HSI of 47.9 (±8.2). Additionally, 10.8% had fibrosis (FIB-4 >2.67) and 42.72% had values in intermediate ranges (FIB-4 1.3-2.67). At 24weeks, there was a significant reduction in HSI (−2.36 (95%CI: 1.83-2.9), p<0.00001) and FIB-4 (−0.075 (95%CI: 0.015-0.14), p<0.016), mainly related to declines in body weight, triglyceride levels, insulin resistance (estimated by the triglyceride-glucose index), and liver enzymes. Conclusion These results show that weekly subcutaneous semaglutide had a beneficial effect on liver steatosis that went beyond glucose control. Its effects were mainly related to weight loss, a decline in biomarkers, and improvements in insulin sensitivity. For many patients, early detection is essential for improving MAFLD outcomes and may allow for selecting the most efficient treatment options (AU)

Derivación y validación de una puntuación de riesgo de ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos para pacientes con COVID-19 / Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19

Fundamento: Identificar y validar una escala de riesgo de ingreso en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) en pacientes hospitalizados con enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Métodos: Realizamos una regla de derivación y otra de validación para ingreso en UCI, utilizando los datos de un registro nacional de cohortes de pacientes con infección confirmada por SARS-CoV-2 ingresados entre marzo y agosto del año 2020 (n = 16.298). Analizamos variables demográficas, clínicas, radiológicas y de laboratorio disponibles en el ingreso hospitalario. Evaluamos el rendimiento de la escala de riesgo mediante estimación del área bajo la curva de característica operativa del receptor (AROC). Utilizamos los coeficientes β del modelo de regresión para elaborar una puntuación (0 a 100 puntos) asociada con ingreso en UCI. Resultados: La edad media de los pacientes fue de 67 años; 57% varones. Un total de 1.420 (8,7%) pacientes ingresaron en la UCI. Las variables independientes asociadas con el ingreso en UCI fueron: edad, disnea, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, cociente neutrófilos-linfocitos, lactato deshidrogenasa e infiltrados difusos en la radiografía de tórax. El modelo mostró un AROC de 0,780 (IC: 0,763-0,797) en la cohorte de derivación y un AROC de 0,734 (IC: 0,708-0,761) en la cohorte de validación. Una puntuación > 75 se asoció con una probabilidad de ingreso en UCI superior a un 30%, mientras que una puntuación < 50 redujo la probabilidad de ingreso en UCI al 15%. Conclusiós: Una puntuación de predicción simple proporcionó una herramienta útil para predecir la probabilidad de ingreso en la UCI con un alto grado de precisión (AU)

Background: This work aims to identify and validate a risk scale for admission to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We created a derivation rule and a validation rule for ICU admission using data from a national registry of a cohort of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted between March and August 2020 (n = 16,298). We analyzed the available demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables recorded at hospital admission. We evaluated the performance of the risk score by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Using the β coefficients of the regression model, we developed a score (0 to 100 points) associated with ICU admission. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67 years; 57% were men. A total of 1,420 (8.7%) patients were admitted to the ICU. The variables independently associated with ICU admission were age, dyspnea, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presence of diffuse infiltrates on a chest X-ray. The model showed an AUROC of 0.780 (CI: 0.763-0.797) in the derivation cohort and an AUROC of 0.734 (CI: 0.708-0.761) in the validation cohort. A score of greater than 75 points was associated with a more than 30% probability of ICU admission while a score of less than 50 points reduced the likelihood of ICU admission to 15%. Conclusion: A simple prediction score was a useful tool for forecasting the probability of ICU admission with a high degree of precision (AU)

Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: This work aims to identify and validate a risk scale for admission to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We created a derivation rule and a validation rule for ICU admission using data from a national registry of a cohort of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted between March and August 2020 (N = 16,298). We analyzed the available demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables recorded at hospital admission. We evaluated the performance of the risk score by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Using the ß coefficients of the regression model, we developed a score (0-100 points) associated with ICU admission. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years; 57% were men. A total of 1420 (8.7%) patients were admitted to the ICU. The variables independently associated with ICU admission were age, dyspnea, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presence of diffuse infiltrates on a chest X-ray. The model showed an AUROC of 0.780 (CI: 0.763-0.797) in the derivation cohort and an AUROC of 0.734 (CI: 0.708-0.761) in the validation cohort. A score of greater than 75 points was associated with a more than 30% probability of ICU admission while a score of less than 50 points reduced the likelihood of ICU admission to 15%. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction score was a useful tool for forecasting the probability of ICU admission with a high degree of precision.

[Derivation and validation of a risk score for admission to the Intensive Care Unit in patients with COVID-19]. / Derivación y validación de una puntuación de riesgo de ingreso en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos para pacientes con COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: This work aims to identify and validate a risk scale for admission to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We created a derivation rule and a validation rule for ICU admission using data from a national registry of a cohort of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were admitted between March and August 2020 (n = 16,298). We analyzed the available demographic, clinical, radiological, and laboratory variables recorded at hospital admission. We evaluated the performance of the risk score by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Using the ß coefficients of the regression model, we developed a score (0 to 100 points) associated with ICU admission. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years; 57% were men. A total of 1,420 (8.7%) patients were admitted to the ICU. The variables independently associated with ICU admission were age, dyspnea, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase levels, and presence of diffuse infiltrates on a chest X-ray. The model showed an AUROC of 0.780 (CI: 0.763-0.797) in the derivation cohort and an AUROC of 0.734 (CI: 0.708-0.761) in the validation cohort. A score of greater than 75 points was associated with a more than 30% probability of ICU admission while a score of less than 50 points reduced the likelihood of ICU admission to 15%. CONCLUSION: A simple prediction score was a useful tool for forecasting the probability of ICU admission with a high degree of precision.

Obesity is a chronic disease. Positioning statement of the Diabetes, Obesity and Nutrition Workgroup of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) for an approach centred on individuals with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a chronic, complex and multifactorial metabolic disease involved in the development of chronic noncommunicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and cancer. The care of individuals with obesity is an essential part of the holistic approach provided by internal medicine to patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between September 2019 and January 2020, we distributed an online survey to the members of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. We prepared a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis using the responses and, using the nominal group technique, developed the recommendations. RESULTS: We obtained 599 responses. The respondents mean age was 44.4 ±â€¯11 years, and 52.1% were women. Some 91.8% of the internists evaluate their patients to rule out the comorbidities associated with obesity, mainly type 2 diabetes mellitus (96.2%), cardiovascular disease (88.9%) and obesity-associated hypoventilation syndrome (73%), among others. Some 79.9% provided indications on lifestyle changes. Some 64.1% and 74.9% of the respondents knew the indications for the drugs and bariatric surgery, respectively. Some 93.8% and 83% of the respondents considered obesity and excess weight a chronic disease, and 88.7% considered it a disease of specific interest to internists, who should take an active and leading role in its treatment (85.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The objective of the present document is to determine the degree of understanding and sensitivity of internists regarding the management of obesity and to develop a consensus of recommendations for the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine based on the scientific evidence and the opinion of its members.

Use of antihyperglycaemic therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes who require hospitalisation: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to internal medicine departments. METHODS: One day, cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalised in internal medicine departments. We recorded demographic and anthropometric variables, laboratory data and use of antihyperglycaemic drugs. The endpoint was the proportion and determinants of the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA). RESULTS: We included 928 patients belonging to 74 hospitals, with a mean age of 78.9 years (SD, 10.86 years), 50% of whom were men. A total of 557 (60%) patients had ischaemic heart disease, 189 (20.4%) had cerebrovascular disease, 293 (31.6%) had heart failure, 274 (29.5%) had chronic kidney disease, and 129 (13.9%) had peripheral arterial disease. Prior to their hospital admission, the patients were taking sulfonylureas (5.7%), biguanides (49.1%), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (0.2%), pioglitazone (0%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (39%), SGLT2i (5.8%), GLP1-RA (2.6%) and basal insulin analogues (24%). An age over 75 years was the main determinant for not taking SGLT2i (adjusted OR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.74; p = .039) or GLP1-RA (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.46; p = .006). DISCUSSION: A large proportion of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at very high cardiovascular risk are not treated with antihyperglycemic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. The most commonly used drugs were metformin and DPP4i. There is room for improvement in the treatment of this very high-risk population.

La obesidad es una enfermedad crónica. Posicionamiento del grupo de trabajo de Diabetes, Obesidad y Nutrición de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI) por un abordaje centrado en la persona con obesidad / Obesity is a chronic disease. Positioning statement of the Diabetes, Obesity and Nutrition Workgroup of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) for an approach centred on individuals with obesity

Introducción La obesidad es una enfermedad metabólica crónica, compleja y multifactorial, implicada en el desarrollo de enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles como la diabetes mellitus tipo 2, las enfermedades cardiovasculares y el cáncer. Es necesario que la atención a las personas con obesidad sea una parte esencial de la visión integral que la medicina interna aporta a la persona enferma. Material y métodos Entre septiembre de 2019 y enero de 2020 se difundió una encuesta en línea a los socios de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna; se elaboró un análisis DAFO con las respuestas y, mediante la técnica de Grupo Nominal, se elaboraron las recomendaciones. Resultados Obtuvimos 599 respuestas. Edad media 44,4±11años; 52,1% mujeres. El 91,8% de los internistas evalúa a los pacientes para descartar las comorbilidades asociadas a la obesidad, principalmente la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (96,2%), la enfermedad cardiovascular (88,9%) o el síndrome de hipoventilación asociada a obesidad (73%), entre otros. El 79,9% proporciona indicaciones sobre modificación del estilo de vida. El 64,1% y el 74,9% conocen las indicaciones de los fármacos y de la cirugía bariátrica, respectivamente. El 93,8% y el 83% consideran la obesidad y el sobrepeso una enfermedad crónica y el 88,7% una patología propia del internista, debiendo tener un papel activo y protagonista en su tratamiento (85,3%). Conclusiones El objetivo del presente documento es dar a conocer el grado de conocimiento y de sensibilidad de los internistas frente al manejo de la obesidad y elaborar un consenso de recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna basadas en la evidencia científica y en la opinión de sus miembros (AU)

Introduction Obesity is a chronic, complex and multifactorial metabolic disease involved in the development of chronic noncommunicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and cancer. The care of individuals with obesity is an essential part of the holistic approach provided by internal medicine to patients. Material and methods Between September 2019 and January 2020, we distributed an online survey to the members of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. We prepared a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis using the responses and, using the nominal group technique, developed the recommendations. Result We obtained 599 responses. The respondents mean age was 44.4±11 years, and 52.1% were women. Some 91.8% of the internists evaluate their patients to rule out the comorbidities associated with obesity, mainly type 2 diabetes mellitus (96.2%), cardiovascular disease (88.9%) and obesity-associated hypoventilation syndrome (73%), among others. Some 79.9% provided indications on lifestyle changes. Some 64.1% and 74.9% of the respondents knew the indications for the drugs and bariatric surgery, respectively. Some 93.8% and 83% of the respondents considered obesity and excess weight a chronic disease, and 88.7% considered it a disease of specific interest to internists, who should take an active and leading role in its treatment (85.3%). Conclusions The objective of the present document is to determine the degree of understanding and sensitivity of internists regarding the management of obesity and to develop a consensus of recommendations for the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine based on the scientific evidence and the opinion of its members (AU)

Uso de terapia antihiperglucemiante con beneficio cardiovascular en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 que requieren hospitalización: un estudio transversal / Use of antihyperglycaemic therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes who require hospitalisation: A cross-sectional study

Objetivo Evaluar el uso de la terapia con beneficio cardiovascular en pacientes con DM tipo 2 previo al ingreso en servicios de medicina interna. Métodos Estudio transversal en un día de los pacientes con DM tipo 2 hospitalizados en servicios de medicina interna. Se recogieron variables demográficas y antropométricas, datos de laboratorio y utilización de fármacos antihiperglucemiantes. La variable desenlace fue la proporción y los determinantes de uso de inhibidores del cotransportador sodio-glucosa 2 (iSGLT2) y de agonistas del receptor del péptido similar al glucagón tipo 1 (AR-GLP1). Resultados Se incluyeron 928 pacientes pertenecientes a 74 hospitales. La edad media fue 78,9 años (DE: 10,86), un 50% varones. Un total de 557 (60%) presentaba cardiopatía isquémica, 189 (20,4%) enfermedad cerebrovascular, 293 (31,6%) insuficiencia cardiaca, 274 (29,5%) enfermedad renal crónica y 129 (13,9%) enfermedad arterial periférica. Los antihiperglucemiantes utilizados previo al ingreso fueron: sulfonilureas (5.7%), biguanidas (49.1%), inhibidores de la alfa-glucosidasa (0,2%), pioglitazona (0%), iDPP4 (39%), iSGLT2 (5,8%), AR-GLP1 (2,6%) y análogos de insulina basal (24%). La edad mayor de 75 años fue el factor determinante principal para no utilizar iSGLT2 (OR ajustada 0,28; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 0,10-0,74; p=0,039) o AR-GLP1 (OR ajustada 0,09; intervalo de confianza al 95%: 0,02-0,46; p=0,006). Discusión Una gran proporción de pacientes ancianos con DM tipo 2 de muy alto riesgo cardiovascular no recibe terapia antihiperglucemiante con fármacos de probado beneficio cardiovascular. El tratamiento más frecuentemente utilizado fue metformina e iDPP4. Existe un margen de mejora en el tratamiento en esta población de muy alto riesgo (AU)

Objective To evaluate the use of therapy with cardiovascular benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to internal medicine departments. Methods One day, cross-sectional study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalised in internal medicine departments. We recorded demographic and anthropometric variables, laboratory data and use of antihyperglycaemic drugs. The endpoint was the proportion and determinants of the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA). Results We included 928 patients belonging to 74 hospitals, with a mean age of 78.9 years (SD, 10.86 years), 50% of whom were men. A total of 557 (60%) patients had ischaemic heart disease, 189 (20.4%) had cerebrovascular disease, 293 (31.6%) had heart failure, 274 (29.5%) had chronic kidney disease, and 129 (13.9%) had peripheral arterial disease. Prior to their hospital admission, the patients were taking sulfonylureas (5.7%), biguanides (49.1%), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (0.2%), pioglitazone (0%), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (39%), SGLT2i (5.8%), GLP1-RA (2.6%) and basal insulin analogues (24%). An age over 75 years was the main determinant for not taking SGLT2i (adjusted OR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.74; P=.039) or GLP1-RA (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.46; P=.006). Discussion A large proportion of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at very high cardiovascular risk are not treated with antihyperglycemic drugs with proven cardiovascular benefit. The most commonly used drugs were metformin and DPP4i. There is room for improvement in the treatment of this very high-risk population (AU)